![]() ![]() Thus, Digital Performer has not been able to record audio using a Power Mac's own built‑in hardware, meaning that it remained the only package dependent on third‑party - effectively, until recently, Digidesign - hardware for the recording and playback of audio. The other big MOTU difference is that while all four major Mac sequencer players have become available in MIDI + Audio versions, whereby digital audio tracks can be recorded and manipulated alsongside MIDI sequences, MOTU took their time when it came to supporting Apple's Sound Manager extension. Successive versions of FreeMIDI have enhanced its compatibility with OMS, but it still retains its own particular flavour. In addition, it provides a certain amount of inter‑application communication within the computer itself (such as with MOTU's editor/librarian Unisyn). Instead they've ploughed ahead with their own FreeMIDI system, which achieves basically the same goal, in a slightly different way, routing MIDI data from the outside world to the sequencer and back, via a MIDI interface (simple or multi‑port) attached to your Mac's serial port(s). There are two reasons for this: firstly, MOTU have not grasped the Opcode‑originated Open Music System (OMS) in the same way as many MIDI software developers. Mark of the Unicorn's Digital Performer is certainly a member of one of the top four Macintosh sequencing families - the others being Steinberg's Cubase, Emagic's Logic, and Opcode's Vision - but a maverick streak at the company means that it has always stood slightly apart. Has it been worth the wait? Derek Johnson finds out. Nearly two years after everybody else jumped on the Power Mac audio bandwagon, Mark of the Unicorn have finally come on board with their flagship sequencer, which will now record and play back audio without the need for external hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |